JOSEPH FRED LOHR, APPELLANT,
v.
DIANE A. LOHR, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court erred in awarding attorney's fees without evidence of the wife's need and the husband's ability to pay, and without making specific findings as required by Rowe.
[1] A trial court errs in awarding attorney's fees to a spouse in a dissolution proceeding without evidence demonstrating the requesting spouse's need and the other spouse's…
[2] A trial court must set forth specific findings regarding the factors considered when awarding attorney's fees, including the reasonableness of hours expended and the appr…
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFollowing a stipulated dismissal of a dissolution proceeding, the trial court reserved jurisdiction for attorney's fees. At the hearing, the wife's at…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Attorney'S Fees Award cases and more on FLexlaw
HALL, Acting Chief Judge.
The husband contends that the trial court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to the wife in a dissolution proceeding where the record was devoid of any evidence showing the wife’s need and the husband’s ability to pay. He also contends that the trial court erred in failing to set forth findings, as required by Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla.1985), in its final order awarding the fees. We agree and reverse.
The original petition for dissolution was dismissed upon the stipulation of the parties. The trial court’s order of dismissal reserved jurisdiction to consider the wife’s motion for attorney’s fees. At a subsequent hearing, the wife’s attorney presented evidence as to the value of his services, but failed to present any evidence as to the husband’s ability to pay or the wife’s need. The trial court thereafter entered an order which determined that the wife’s attorney was entitled to a fee of $6000 and required that the husband contribute $4250 towards the wife’s attorney’s fees, and pay $866.37 for costs.
At the hearing to determine whether the wife was entitled to fees, no financial affidavits or other evidence of the parties’ financial positions were produced for the record. In light of the lack of any evidence demonstrating the financial need of the wife and sufficient assets of the husband showing an ability to pay, the court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to the wife.
As we stated in Shields v. Shields, 502 So. 2d 1349, 1350 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987): “Rowe requires the trial court not only determine the proper amount of attorney’s fees by considering the basic rate, the number of hours reasonably expended in the case, and the appropriateness of the reduction of enhancement figures, but also to set forth specific findings as to those factors.”
We therefore reverse and remand with directions that the trial court conduct a new hearing on attorney’s fees consistent herewith.
THREADGILL and PATTERSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Thurner v. Cheri J. Thurner, 584 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…y to pay, and that the court awarded attorneys’ fees in excess of the fee agreement reached by the attorney and wife. From the meager record, there appears to be enough to make a finding of husband’s ability to pay and the wife’s need. Lohr v. Lohr, 552 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). However, no such finding was made by the trial court. It is error to award attorneys’ fees in excess of the fee agreement reached by the attorney and client where there has been no showing that the client was required to fee barg…
Authorities Cited
- Fla. Patient's Comp. Fund v. Rowe, 472 So. 2d 1145 (Fla. 1985)
- Shields v. Lissi Shields, 502 So. 2d 1349 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)