JOSEPH GORE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1989-11-22
No. 89-0381
HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.
552 So. 2d 340 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the sentences imposed by the trial court. See Perez v. State, 524 So. 2d 720 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1321, 103 L.Ed.2d 590 (1989). We reverse the trial court’s imposition of costs or community service for failure to afford appellant notice and an opportunity to be heard. See Jenkins v. State, 444 So. 2d 947 (Fla.1984); Mays v. State, 519 So. 2d 618 (Fla.1988).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., and DELL and STONE, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • The Am. S. Co. & Dev. Corp. of Am. v. Tinter, Inc., 565 So. 2d 891 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
    …duplicate taking of depositions. The standard applicable for a writ of common-law certiorari is whether the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law and there exist adequate remedies for any injury or harm. See Glasser v. Darren, 552 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). Generally, a trial court possesses broad discretion in granting or refusing discovery motions and in protecting the parties. Only an abuse of this broad discretion would constitute “fatal error.” Orlowitz v. Orlowitz, 199 So. 2…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw