UNITED PAPER CONVERTER, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
LEMBO MIDLAND, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, D/B/A ARROW LEMBO MIDLAND AND ARROW LM., INC., APPELLEE
UNITED PAPER CONVERTER, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
LEMBO MIDLAND, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, D/B/A ARROW LEMBO MIDLAND AND ARROW LM., INC., APPELLEE
553 So. 2d 287
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
A review of the 'complaint and affidavits reveals sufficient allegations of jurisdictional facts for the purpose of long-arm jurisdiction. This case is factually indistinguishable from Lacy v. Force V Corp., 403 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), which held that where a contract with an Ohio corporation was to be performed within the State of Florida, it was breached in Florida for the purpose of the Florida court’s jurisdiction over the corporation. § 48.193(l)(g), Fla. Stat. (1987).
The order dismissing the cause for lack of jurisdiction over the person is reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Wilcox v. State, 586 So. 2d 1252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…court was a successive motion, raising claims obviously known to the appellant at the time of his prior motions. Therefore, the action of the trial court should be affirmed. See Elkins v. State, 555 So. 2d 441 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Mullings v. State, 553 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). Affirmed.…
Authorities Cited
- Harlan C. "Bud" Lacy v. Force V Corp., 403 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981)