JOE PADGETT, APPELLANT,

v.

THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Witt v. Witt, 568 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)
  …rt specifically retained jurisdiction to rule on enforcement actions. Appellee brought such an enforcement action, but lost due to the fact the refund check was not subject to the retained jurisdiction of the trial court. See Steinfeld v. Steinfeld, 553 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989) (retained jurisdiction of trial court does not include property not specifically addressed in the settlement agreement or final judgment). It is clear appellant prevailed in the action given that appellee failed to obtain a favor…
• Cralle v. Cralle, 848 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)
  …ple’s 1988 and 1992 federal income tax liability. The trial court entered a final judgment in favor of the former husband. The 1994 marital settlement agreement did not preclude the former husband from bringing the action. In Steinfeld v. Steinfeld, 553 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), we held that an action separate from the dissolution of marriage was the proper procedural vehicle to have the court determine entitlement to the proceeds of a tax refund check payable to the husband and wife jointly, where neit…
• Mueller v. Kamenesh, 864 So. 2d 38 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003)
  …l court lacked subject matter — more accurately, "case” — jurisdiction over the deposit dispute, see and compare Davis v. Dieujuste, 496 So. 2d 806 (Fla.1986); Garcia-Roque v. Roque-Velasco, 855 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Steinfeld v. Steinfeld, 553 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Brandt v. Brandt, 525 So. 2d 1017 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), falls with our determination that the sum is included within the terms of the agreement and judgment and was therefore subject to the usual reservation of jurisdiction in th…

Authorities Cited

• Lambert v. State, 545 So. 2d 838 (Fla. 1989)
• Empire Marble & Granite, Inc. v. Ralph and Lorraine Bodek, 554 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)
• Perez v. State, 554 So. 2d 14 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)