JOHN BRADFORD
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge an illegal sentence that imposed a single twenty-year term for multiple offenses and exceeded the statutory maximum for a third-degree felony under Florida Statutes section 775.084(4)(a).
[1] A general sentence imposed for multiple offenses in a single judgment is an illegal sentence under Florida law.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBradford was sentenced as a habitual felony offender to twenty years imprisonment for a second-degree felony and a third-degree felony. His direct app…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Ineffective Assistance Of Appellate Counsel cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner, John Bradford, petitions this Court for relief alleging appellate counsel provided ineffective assistance. His direct appeal to this Court from judgment and sentence of the Circuit Court for Leon County resulted in an affirmance. Bradford v. State, 232 So. 3d 978 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017). Petitioner claims appellate counsel was deficient for failing to file a motion challenging the sentence, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b), and for failing to challenge the sentence in his direct appeal. We agree.
The trial court sentenced Petitioner as a habitual felony offender to a term of imprisonment of twenty years for a second-
degree felony and a third-degree felony. This general sentence imposed for multiple offenses is an illegal sentence. See Parks v. State, 765 So. 2d 35, 36 (Fla. 2000); Munoz v. State, 218 So. 3d 459 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). The imposition of a twenty-year sentence on the third-degree felony is also illegal because it exceeds the maximum sentence authorized by section 775.084(4)(a), Florida Statutes (2015), for the offense. Accordingly, we grant the petition, vacate Bradford’s sentence, and remand for resentencing.
LEWIS and BILBREY, JJ., concur; B.L. THOMAS, J., dissents without opinion.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Parks v. State, 765 So. 2d 35 (Fla. 2000)
- Munoz v. State, 218 So. 3d 459 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)
- Bradford v. State, 232 So. 3d 978 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017)