SABRINA ELISE CRESPO
v.
WALTER LEE WATTS, JR., AND STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, CHILD SUPPORT PROGRAM
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court reversed a child support order because the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) improperly imputed the mother's past wages without determining if her unemployment was voluntary. The court found insufficient evidence to support the imputation and remanded for recalculation based on the federal minimum wage.
Yes, the ALJ erred by imputing the mother's 2018 wages without determining the voluntariness of her unemployment and with insufficient financial information. The court reversed this decision.
[1] Before imputing a parent's prior wages in a child support case, the trier of fact must first determine whether the unemployment was voluntary through a two-step analysis…
[2] When a parent's unemployment reason is unexplained and reliable current financial information is unavailable, the ALJ must presume the parent capable of earning federal m…
Previewing 2 of 2 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Florida law requires an ALJ to impute income to a parent in accordance with section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2019), unless there is a lack of reliable, current financial information available.”
Establishes the general rule and exception for imputing income.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe mother failed to appear at a child support hearing, providing limited financial information. The ALJ imputed the mother's 2018 wages despite a lac…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Voluntary Unemployment cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The mother raises two issues on appeal. In her first issue, the mother argues that the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) erred by imputing her 2018 wages to her. We agree that this was error and reverse. We affirm the second issue without comment.
The record shows that in 2018, the mother applied for assistance, and the Department of Revenue (DOR) assisted her with establishing paternity and support for the parties’ child. After DOR sent the parties a proposed final order of paternity and support, the father timely requested a hearing. When the matter came before the ALJ for a hearing, the mother failed to appear even though she was properly noticed.
During the hearing, the ALJ noted the lack of financial information she had for the mother. The mother filled out only two of the six pages concerning her financial information, and one of those pages contained only the mother’s signature and the date. At some point in time, the mother provided her 2018 W-2 and a form stating that she was a full-time student. Because the mother was receiving cash assistance, DOR indicated that the mother was not working. However, no evidence was presented concerning why or how the mother became unemployed.
Florida law requires an ALJ to impute income to a parent in accordance with section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2019), unless there is a lack of reliable, current financial information available. § 409.2563(6), Fla. Stat. (2019). When determining whether to impute income, the trier of fact must first determine whether the unemployment was voluntary, followed by a determination of the amount of income to be imputed. Windsor v. Windsor, 262 So. 3d 853, 854 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018). In order to determine whether a parent’s unemployment is voluntary, the court applies a two-step process: (1) whether the termination of employment was voluntary, and (2) whether the unemployment resulted from the parent’s pursuit of her own interests or through the less-than-diligent and bona fide efforts to find employment at or higher than her former employment. Wood v. Wood, 162 So. 3d 133, 136 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014).
The ALJ noted that she did not know why the mother was unemployed, and there is no evidence in the record concerning this issue. Because there was no evidence concerning the reason behind the mother’s unemployment, the ALJ could not determine whether the mother’s unemployment was voluntary. Since the ALJ could not determine if the mother’s unemployment was voluntary, the ALJ could not impute income to the mother in accordance with section 61.30, Florida Statutes (2019).
In addition to not knowing whether the mother was voluntarily unemployed, the ALJ possessed very little information about the mother’s income. The information the ALJ had was not reliable and current. As a result, section 409.2563(6) required the ALJ to presume the mother was capable of earning the federal minimum wage. Since the father did not present any evidence to rebut this presumption, the ALJ was required to impute the federal minimum wage. Accordingly, we reverse and remand for the ALJ to impute the federal minimum wage to the mother and to recalculate the father’s child support accordingly.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED with instructions.
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur. _____________________________