VAN JACKSON
v.
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Jurisdictional Time Limits cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant Van Jackson, an inmate in the Florida correctional system, challenges the dismissal of his petition for a writ of mandamus as untimely filed. Assuming the petition was given to officials of the Department of Corrections for mailing on April 24, 2018, as claimed by Appellant, the petition was nevertheless untimely filed. See Thompson v. State, 761 So. 2d 324, 326 (Fla. 2000) (“The important date for purposes of the mailbox rule is the date when the inmate hands over his or her documents to prison officials for mailing.”).
As Appellant alleged in the petition, his administrative remedies were exhausted when the Secretary of the Department
denied the administrative appeal of his grievance on March 14, 2018. A party challenging a “disciplinary proceeding conducted by the Department of Corrections” has 30 days to file a court action. § 95.11(8), Fla. Stat. (2018). This time limit is jurisdictional, and hence, the trial court correctly dismissed the petition. See Whitfield v. Dep’t of Corr., 107 So. 3d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013).
AFFIRMED.
RAY, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Orlan L. Hagins v. Inch (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)
Authorities Cited
- Thompson v. State, 761 So. 2d 324 (Fla. 2000)
- Whitfield v. Dep't OF Corr., 107 So. 3d 1210 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013)