NARCISCO RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-12-13
No. 89-939
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and JORGENSON, JJ.
553 So. 2d 1331 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989) Positive Treatment
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the appellant’s convictions because he was charged, in effect, with three misdemeanors in the circuit court. The state contends that the driver-under-the-influence charge, because it referred to Section 316.193(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1988), was sufficient to make this charge a felony because of prior convictions and cites Pritchard v. State, 528 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). We think the proper procedure is to include in the charging document identifiable prior convictions. Compare State v. Gayety Theatres, Inc., 521 So. 2d 231 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) and Brehm v. State, 427 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983). We specifically decline to follow Pritchard and recognize conflict therewith. Therefore the motion to dismiss should have been granted and the convictions of driving under the influence and driving with a suspended license and attaching an unassigned registration license plate be and the same are hereby reversed with directions to discharge the defendant.

Reversed and remanded with directions.1

. No rehearing time will be allowed and the mandate will forthwith issue.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Narcisco Rodriguez, 575 So. 2d 1262 (Fla. 1991)
    …BARKETT, Judge. We accepted jurisdiction to resolve an express and direct conflict between Rodriguez v. State, 553 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), and Pritchard v. State, 528 So. 2d 1272 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988).1 The issue is whether a charging document must specifically allege three or more prior convictions for Driving Under the Influence (DUI) when charging a defendant with…
  • Ogden v. State, 605 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992)
    …t he shall be sentenced to serve.” Generally, a defendant is not entitled to credit for time served on community control against any term of incarceration subsequently imposed. See State v. Collins, 585 So. 2d 454 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Swain v. State, 553 So. 2d 1331 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); State v. Arnold, 550 So. 2d 154 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Mathews v. State, 529 So. 2d 361 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). However, as we have pointed out, this general rule has now been modified by Fraser v. State, which held that a defendant i…
  • KIO v. State, 624 So. 2d 744 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
    …upon remand for resentencing, the trial court is free to consider whether a departure sentence would be appropriate in this ease. See State v. Betancourt, 552 So. 2d 1107 (Fla.1989); Roberts v. State, 547 So. 2d 129, 131 (Fla.1989); Swain v. State, 553 So. 2d 1331, 1334 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). ZEHMER, J., concurs. BOOTH, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. . In 1991, rule 3.701(d)7 was amended to provide: Victim injury shall be scored for each victim physically injured during a criminal episode or tran…

Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw