SPENSER DANIELS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Frivolous Filings cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. See State v. McBride, 848 So. 2d 287, 290–91 (Fla. 2003) (explaining that collateral estoppel prohibits a defendant from raising the same illegal sentencing claim that has already been raised in a prior postconviction motion and decided against him on the merits). Appellant is warned that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous or malicious may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures. See § 944.279(1), Fla. Stat. (2019) (providing that “[a] prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal . . . is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections”). RAY, C.J., and LEWIS and JAY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Daniels v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2024)
Authorities Cited
- State v. Antoine L. McBRIDE, 848 So. 2d 287 (Fla. 2003)