BENITO CONCEPCION AND MARIA RICHARDS, APPELLANTS,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
BENITO CONCEPCION AND MARIA RICHARDS, APPELLANTS,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
554 So. 2d 4
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Brumbley v. State, 453 So. 2d 381 (Fla.1984); Goodwin v. State, 405 So. 2d 170 (Fla.1981); and Mills v. State, 407 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rescom Invs., Inc. v. Strategic Consulting & Managing, Inc., 635 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994)…Ass’n, 534 So. 2d 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988). In this case there were no exceptional circumstances, and uncontested testimony showed the property to be worth two to two and one-half million dollars. Clearly, a $10,000 bond is inadequate. Cohen v. Rubin, 554 So. 2d 4 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (trial court erred in setting receivership bond at $1,000 where property was valued at $1,400,000). We, therefore, reverse that portion of the order which set the appellee’s bond for the receivership at $10,000 and, as in Cohen,…
Authorities Cited
- Mills v. State, 407 So. 2d 218 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
- Brumbley v. State, 453 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 1984)
- Goodwin v. State, 405 So. 2d 170 (Fla. 1981)