HERMAN COHEN AND NEW SUNRISE INVESTMENT CORP., APPELLANTS,
v.
SANDRA RUBIN, FORMERLY SANDRA COHEN, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-12-05
No. 89-2078
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and LEVY, JJ.
554 So. 2d 4 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court affirmed the appointment of a receiver but reversed the bond amount, finding it inadequate.


Facts & Procedural History

Appellants appealed orders appointing a receiver for real property and setting the receiver's bond. A prior judgment had established the property was …

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
LEVY, Judge.

LEVY, Judge.

Property owners Herman Cohen and New Sunrise Investment Corporation appeal nonfinal orders appointing a receiver for real property in which the appellee, Sandra Rubin, owns a 50% interest. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130(a)(3)(C)(ii).

There is ample evidence in the record to support the trial court’s decision to appoint a receiver under the facts of this case, where a prior judgment had established that the property was fraudulently conveyed by the appellants. See Fleming v. Otis Elevator Co., 107 Fla. 557, 145 So. 201 (Fla.1933). Accordingly, we affirm as to the appointment of a receiver. The appellants also claim that the trial court erred in setting the appellee’s bond for receivership at $1,000.00, where the properties placed in receivership were valued at approximately $1,400,000.00. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse the order setting bond at $1,000.00 and remand with instructions to the trial court to hold a hearing, guided by the principles of Parker Tampa Two, Inc. v. Somerset Development Corp., 544 So. 2d 1018 (Fla.1989), to set a reasonable and adequate bond.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part; and remanded with instructions.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw