KEE FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENTS, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE
KEE FINANCIAL AND INVESTMENTS, INC., APPELLANT,
FLORIDA NATIONAL BANK, APPELLEE
554 So. 2d 6
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Burdine-Coakley v. Capital Bank, 542 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Ossip Harris Ins., Inc. v. Barnett Bank of South Florida, N.A., 428 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sanders v. Am. Body Armor & Equip., Inc., 652 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…te based on failure to warn. We agree with the trial court that the absence of protection at the sides or abutment area of Armor’s vest was open and obvious and, therefore, no warning was required as a matter of law. Knox v. Delta Int’l Mach. Corp., 554 So. 2d 6 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); Georgiar-Pacific Corp. v. Reid, 501 So. 2d 653 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), review denied, 509 So. 2d 1118 (Fla.1987). We write only to clarify the matter of concurrent causes. The trial court’s directed verdict was based in part on the…
-
Hunnings v. Texaco, Inc., 29 F.3d 1480 (11th Cir. 1994)…d, however, that the bulk manufacturers and distributors in the present case had no such duty to warn against the hazards of ingesting mineral spirits because the danger attendant to doing so is common knowledge. See Knox v. Delta Int'l Mach. Corp., 554 So. 2d 6, 7 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1989) (manufacturers have no duty to warn consumers of obvious dangers); Clark v. Boeing Co., 395 So. 2d 1226, 1228-29 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1981) (same). The court stated that because the danger is well known to all, the sellers at e…
Authorities Cited
- D.W. v. State, 428 So. 2d 363 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
- Burdine-Coakley v. Cap. Bank, 542 So. 2d 1019 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)