JOSEPH KEITH FOWLER
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2021-04-16
No. 19-4239
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2021) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Tanenbaum

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Schmidt v. State, 310 So. 3d 135, 137 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that section 948.06(2)(f)1.c., Florida Statutes, applies to a probationer with only with a single technical probation violation).

BILBREY, WINOKUR, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Joel Arnold, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Daren L. Shippy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Dennis v. State, 303 So. 3d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)
    …PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. See Schmidt v. State, 310 So. 3d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that sub-subparagraph c. does not include defendants with more than one technical violation of probation); Owens v. State, 303 So. 3d 993 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that section 948.06(2)(f)1., Florida Statutes, should…
  • Phillips v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)
    …2020) (holding that section 948.06(2)(f)1., Florida Statutes, should be construed to require that a defendant meet all the conditions listed in sub-subparagraphs a. through d. to qualify for application of subparagraphs 1. and 2.); Schmidt v. State, 310 So. 3d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that sub-subparagraph c. does not include defendants with more than one technical violation of probation). KELSEY, M.K. THOMAS, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition o…
  • Adams v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)
    …DCA 2020) (holding that section 948.06(2)(f)1., Florida Statutes, should be construed to require that a defendant meet all conditions listed in sub-subparagraphs a. through d. to qualify for application of subparagraphs 1. and 2.); Schmidt v. State, 310 So. 3d 135 (Fla. 1st DCA 2020) (holding that sub-subparagraph c. does not include defendants with more than one technical violation of probation). B.L. THOMAS, KELSEY, and TANENBAUM, JJ., concur. _____________________________ Not final until disposition o…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw