JAMES FRANCIES JENKINS JR.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders V. California cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Upon review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we find no reversible error and affirm Appellant’s judgment and sentence. We remand, however, for correction of two scrivener’s errors contained in the written judgment. First, the judgment specifies that Appellant pled nolo contendere to, and was adjudicated guilty of, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon (Count 2). However, this count was dismissed pursuant to the written plea agreement and the trial court’s oral pronouncement. Second, the judgment includes court costs and fines in the amount of $1,140, contrary to the $1,040 assessment specified in the plea agreement and orally pronounced by the trial court. In both instances, the oral pronouncements control over the written judgment. See Williams v. State, 303 So. 3d 1290 (Fla. 1st DCA
2020). Appellant need not be present when the trial court corrects these errors. AFFIRMED and REMANDED for correction of scrivener’s errors. RAY, C.J., and MAKAR and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- Wolk v. State (Fla. 1st DCA 2021)