JACK GRISS, APPELLANT,
v.
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, APPELLEE
JACK GRISS, APPELLANT,
AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, APPELLEE
554 So. 2d 556
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The dispositive question is whether the use of deadly force in self-defense constitutes intentional conduct causing harm to another within the exclusion-from-coverage provision of a homeowner’s insurance policy. On the authority of Marshall v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 534 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), rev. granted,,
544 So. 2d 201 (Fla.1989), we answer the question in the negative, and certify the question.
Reversed and remanded.
. Marshall conflicts with Clemmons v. American States Ins. Co., 412 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Griss, 568 So. 2d 903 (Fla. 1990)…PER CURIAM. We review Griss v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 554 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), in which the district court certified the following question as one of great public importance: [W]hether the use of deadly force in self-defense constitutes intentional conduct causing harm to another within the exclusion-from-…
-
Griss v. AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co., 582 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)…WHEREAS, the opinion rendered by this Court on December 5,1989, (554 So. 2d 556), reversed and remanded the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and WHEREAS, on review of this Court’s opinion, by Petition for Review, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion filed September 20, 199…
Authorities Cited
- Clemmons v. Am. States Ins. Co., 412 So. 2d 906 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- Marshall v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 534 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)