KAREN KERNAN, AS TRUSTEE, UNDER THE 3725 HELMIG LAND TRUST AGREEMENT, ET AL.
v.
DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE, ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Karen Kernan appeals a foreclosure judgment and challenges the foreclosure sale conducted on her property. The court held that the foreclosure sale was improper because it occurred while her timely motion for rehearing was pending, which suspended enforcement of the judgment, and therefore reversed and vacated the sale while remanding for a new sale date.
Yes. The foreclosure sale must be vacated because it was conducted while Kernan's timely motion for rehearing was pending. Under well-settled law, enforcement of a final judgment is suspended by the filing of a timely rehearing motion, and no foreclosure sale may be held during that suspension.
[1] A foreclosure sale cannot be held while a timely motion for rehearing is pending because the filing of the motion suspends enforcement of the final judgment.
[2] A foreclosure sale conducted while a timely motion for rehearing is pending must be set aside.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“It is well settled that a foreclosure sale cannot be held while a timely motion for rehearing is pending because enforcement of a final judgment is suspended by the filing of the rehearing motion.”
Establishes the fundamental legal principle that suspension of judgment enforcement prevents foreclosure sales during pending rehearing motions.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceKaren Kernan, individually and as Trustee under the 3725 Helmig Land Trust Agreement, was the defendant in a foreclosure action brought by Deutsche Ba…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Certificate Of Sale cases and more on FLexlaw
LaROSE, Judge. Karen Kernan, individually and as Trustee under the 3725 Helmig Land Trust Agreement, appeals the trial court's final judgment of foreclosure, order denying Ms. Kernan's motion for rehearing and to vacate final judgment, and order denying Ms. Kernan's objection and motion to vacate the sale and certificate of sale.
- 2 - Ms. Kernan correctly argues and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for Morgan Stanley Home Equity Loan Trust 2006-1, correctly concedes that she is entitled to vacatur of the foreclosure sale because the sale occurred while Ms. Kernan's timely motion for rehearing was pending in the trial court. See Lowenstein v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 253 So. 3d 86, 87 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) ("It is well settled that a foreclosure sale cannot be held while a timely motion for rehearing is pending because enforcement of a final judgment is suspended by the filing of the rehearing motion." (quoting 944 CWELT–2007 LLC v. Bank of Am., N.A., 194 So. 3d 470, 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016))); Hoffman v. BankUnited, N.A., 137 So. 3d 1039, 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) ("[W]e agree that the foreclosure sale of the property must be set aside because the sale was conducted while Hoffman's timely motion for rehearing was pending.").
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's order denying Ms. Kernan's objection and motion to vacate the sale and certificate of sale, vacate the foreclosure sale, and remand with instructions for the trial court to set a new foreclosure sale date and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. See Hoffman, 137 So. 3d at 1039 ("Because the trial court disposed of the rehearing motion some time after the sale, the court may again order the foreclosure sale of the property on remand.").
We affirm in all other respects, without comment.
Affirmed in part; reversed in part; vacated in part; remanded with directions. KHOUZAM, C.J., and VILLANTI, J., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- 944 Cwelt-2007 LLC v. Bank OF Am., N.A., 194 So. 3d 470 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016)
- Hoffman v. Bankunited, N.A., 137 So. 3d 1039 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014)
- Lowenstein v. U. S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 253 So. 3d 86 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018)