CAROLINE L. CONSTANTINO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE
v.
ROBERT G. GENUNG
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court reversed a lower court's order that set aside a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. The court found that the newly discovered evidence presented was insufficient to change the original outcome and that the successor judge improperly substituted his judgment for that of the original judge.
The appellate court held that the newly discovered evidence would not have probably changed the result of the original proceeding. The court also held that the successor judge improperly substituted his judgment for that of the original judge.
[1] A successor judge has only limited authority to issue orders inconsistent with a predecessor judge's rulings, and may not set aside a final judgment based on newly discov…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“The record compels us to conclude that the newly discovered evidence would not "probably [have] change[d] the result of the proceeding[]"”
This quote establishes the legal standard for newly discovered evidence and the court's finding that it was not met.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceCaroline L. Constantino, as personal representative of the Estate of Martha A. Genung, appealed an order that set aside a final judgment of dissolutio…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Successor Judge Authority cases and more on FLexlaw
) as personal representative of the ) Estate of Martha A. Genung, ) deceased, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3724 ) ROBERT G. GENUNG, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed August 7, 2020. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Collier County; Scott H. Cupp, Judge. Mark V. Silverio and Cynthia B. Hall of Silverio & Hall, P.A., Naples, for Appellant. Jennifer J. Kennedy of Abbey, Adams, Byelick, & Mueller, L.L.P., St. Petersburg, for Appellee. ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, Judge. Caroline L. Constantino, as personal representative of the Estate of Martha A. Genung, appeals from the August 21, 2018, order that sets aside the trial court's August 30, 2017, final judgment of dissolution of marriage based on newly
- 2 - discovered evidence. The record compels us to conclude that the newly discovered evidence would not "probably [have] change[d] the result of the proceeding[]," see Edrington v. Edrington, 945 So. 2d 608, 610 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006), and that the successor judge instead impermissibly substituted his judgment for that of the judge who rendered the final judgment, see Davis v. Fisher, 391 So. 2d 810, 811 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) ("It is not the function of one trial judge to review another's judgment." (citing Groover v. Walker, 88 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1956); McBride v. McBride, 352 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977))); see also State v. Gary, 609 So. 2d 1291, 1293 (Fla. 1992) ("As the successor judge, Chief Judge Gary had only limited authority to issue orders inconsistent with his predecessor's rulings. Limits have proved necessary ' "to promote the stability of decisions of judges of the same court and to avoid unseemly contests and differences that otherwise might arise among them to the detriment of public confidence in the judicial function." ' " (first citing Tingle v. Dade Cty. Bd. of Cty. Comm'rs, 245 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1971); and then quoting Epperson v. Epperson, 101 So. 2d 367, 369 (Fla. 1958))). Accordingly, we reverse and remand with instructions to reinstate the judgment. Reversed; remanded with instructions. NORTHCUTT and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Groover v. Walker, 88 So. 2d 312 (Fla. 1956)
- Anne E. Tingle v. Dade Cnty. Bd. OF Cnty. Comm'rs, 245 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 1971)
- McBRIDE v. McBRIDE, 352 So. 2d 1254 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)
- Davis v. Fisher, 391 So. 2d 810 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)
- State v. Gary, 609 So. 2d 1291 (Fla. 1992)
- Edrington v. Edrington, 945 So. 2d 608 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)