DONA B. DAVIS (CARR), APPELLANT,
v.
DENNIS CARR, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the wife's claim for special equity in the marital residence proceeds.
The wife contributed funds derived from the sale of premarital property to pay marital expenses, including the down payment on the marital home. The t…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Marital Residence cases and more on FLexlaw
RYDER, Judge.
Dona B. Davis challenges the trial court’s denial of her claim for special equity in the proceeds of the sale of the marital residence in the final judgment dissolving the marriage herein. We reverse.
Appellee Dennis Carr contributed his current salary income and Davis contributed current rental income from her real property, as well as funds derived from the sale of premarital property, to pay marital expenses. Carr’s salary income and Davis’ rental income are placed in the marital “pot.” However, to the extent Davis can show that proceeds from the sale of her. premarital property were used to pay marital expenses, she has a special equity. Johnson v. Johnson, 517 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Horton v. Horton, 480 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986).
The trial court abused its discretion in denying Davis’ special equity claim because Davis clearly showed in her uncontradicted testimony that funds traceable to premarital assets were used to pay marital expenses, including the down payment on the marital home and other expenses related thereto. By treating the marital home as marital property and dividing it in half, the court has deprived Davis of her special equity therein.
Although Davis’ testimony was confusing and seemingly not credible, she clearly proved that the proceeds from the premarital property went into the “pot.” The trial court should not have denied her a special equity merely because the accounting was difficult or confusing. Davis is entitled to at least some amount of special equity in the marital home. The trial court must determine the precise amount and reapportion the proceeds from the sale of the marital home in accordance with the formula set forth in Landay v. Landay, 429 So. 2d 1197 (Fla.1983).
We reverse the order appealed and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
CAMPBELL, C.J., and PATTERSON, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ter Keurst v. Ter Keurst, 202 So. 3d 123 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016)…2008, a trial court was permitted, in appropriate circumstances, to award one spouse a special equity in a marital property in recognition of his or her contribution of premarital funds to the acquisition of that property. See, e.g., Davis v. Carr, 554 So. 2d 669, 669-70 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). In 2008, however, the legislature amended the equitable distribution statute to provide that “[sjpecial equity is abolished” and that “[a]ll claims formerly identified as special equity, and all special equity calculation…
-
Straley v. Frank, 585 So. 2d 334 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…court has expressly addressed that question, contrary to the assertions by the majority opinion. That is no doubt because the statute is new, and it only applies to cases filed after its effective date: October 1, 1988.2 For example, Davis v. Carr, 554 So. 2d 669 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), cited by the majority opinion, was issued January 5, 1990 by the appellate court. The present case was originally released October 11, 1990, and the new statute just barely (a matter of days) applied to it. Miceli v. Miceli, 533…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Sumner Landay v. Landay, 429 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1983)
- Johnson v. Johnson, 517 So. 2d 790 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)
- Horton v. Onyx Horton, 480 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)