RANDALL STEVEN MOE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
RANDALL STEVEN MOE, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
554 So. 2d 675
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Mikenas v. State, 460 So. 2d 359 (Fla.1984); Smith v. State, 453 So. 2d 388 (Fla.1984); Zeigler v. State, 452 So. 2d 537 (Fla.1984); Ford v. State, 407 So. 2d 907 (Fla.1981); State v. Wooden, 246 So. 2d 755 (Fla.1971).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Rhoda Smith, 592 So. 2d 1100 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…ion.” Pope, 561 So. 2d at 556. The opinion also acknowledges that the practice in some districts, including this one, has been to remand in order for the trial court to reduce its oral reasons to a written order, id.; see also, e.g., State v. Evans, 554 So. 2d 675 (Fla.App.1990); State v. Gavins, 555 So. 2d 933 (Fla.App.1990); Oden v. State, 463 So. 2d 313 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), aff'd 478 So. 2d 51 (Fla.1985), and Pope effectively overrules those decisions. Although we follow Pope as announced, we certify to th…
Authorities Cited
- Mikenas v. State, 460 So. 2d 359 (Fla. 1984)
- Zeigler v. State, 452 So. 2d 537 (Fla. 1984)
- Smith v. State, 453 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 1984)
- State v. Wooden, 246 So. 2d 755 (Fla. 1971)
- Ford v. State, 407 So. 2d 907 (Fla. 1981)