TASHARA FREEMAN
v.
PRECIOUS ROGERS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Tashara Freeman appeals a final judgment of injunction for protection against stalking entered against her. Freeman claims she attempted to appear virtually at the hearing but was disconnected, and the trial court erred by entering the judgment without addressing her claims of justifiable non-appearance.
The trial court erred by entering the judgment without addressing Freeman's allegations that she attempted to appear virtually and was disconnected. On remand, the trial court must either conduct a hearing on Freeman's motion for rehearing to determine whether her failure to appear was justifiable or grant the motion for rehearing and conduct a new injunction hearing.
[1] A trial court must conduct a hearing on a motion for rehearing when the movant alleges justifiable circumstances for their failure to appear at a prior hearing.
[2] A trial court abuses its discretion by denying a motion for rehearing without addressing the movant's allegations of justifiable failure to appear.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Freeman was required to drive to the courthouse, stay in her car, and appear before the judge via the virtual courtroom or teleconference.”
Describes the COVID-19 pandemic protocols requiring Freeman's attempted virtual appearance
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFreeman was required to appear virtually via teleconference for an injunction hearing in Polk County Circuit Court due to COVID-19 pandemic protocols.…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Injunction For Protection Against Stalking cases and more on FLexlaw
MORRIS, Judge. Tashara Freeman appeals a final judgment of injunction for protection against stalking entered in favor of Precious Rogers. The final judgment of injunction indicates that Freeman failed to appear
for the injunction hearing.
The record indicates that the parties were instructed to appear virtually for the hearing in Polk County Circuit Civil, Family Court, due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Freeman was required to drive to the courthouse, stay in her car, and appear before the judge via the virtual courtroom or teleconference. The instructions provided a phone number and conference ID for appearing by teleconference.
On appeal, Freeman asserts that the trial court erred in entering the judgment when she was unable to appear virtually at the hearing. She claims that she called into the hearing but was disconnected. She raised this issue in a timely motion for rehearing, which the trial court denied. In denying Freeman's motion for rehearing, the trial court did not address her allegations that she tried to appear virtually.
We reverse and remand for the trial court to either conduct a hearing on Freeman's motion for rehearing to determine whether her failure to appear virtually at the injunction hearing was justifiable or grant the motion for rehearing and conduct a new injunction hearing. See Ey v. State, 960 So. 2d 853, 854 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (reversing order dismissing postconviction motion and remanding for trial court to either
conduct a hearing on defendant's motion for rehearing, in which he explained that his reasons and circumstances for his failure to appear were justifiable, or grant that motion and conduct a hearing on the merits of the postconviction motion). Reversed and remanded. KHOUZAM, C.J., and SMITH, J., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.