J. K.
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
When a trial court revokes a juvenile's probation, it must render a written order setting forth the specific conditions of probation that were violated.
[1] When a trial court revokes a juvenile's probation, the court must render a written order that specifically sets forth the conditions of probation that were violated.
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“[T]he law is well-settled: if the trial court revokes a juvenile's probation, the court is required to render a written order setting forth the conditions of probation that were violated.”
Court citing Badgers v. State, 267 So. 3d 512, 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
J.K., a juvenile, appealed an order revoking his probation after the court found he had violated it. Although a written violation order was rendered, …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
KHOUZAM, Judge.
In this Anders1 appeal, J.K., a juvenile, appeals an order revoking his probation after the court found that he had violated it.
We affirm in all respects except that we remand for the court to correct the violation order.
The record shows that although a written violation order was rendered, it did not specify the conditions that J.K. was found to have violated. "[T]he law is well-settled: if the trial court revokes a juvenile's probation, the court is required to render a written order setting forth the conditions of probation that were violated." Badgers v. State, 267 So. 3d 512, 513 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019) (alteration in original) (quoting T.M. v. State, 233 So. 3d 1275, 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)).
Accordingly, we affirm but remand for the trial court to enter a written revocation order setting forth the specific conditions of probation that J.K. was found to have violated. See, e.g., A.T.J.F. v. State, 78 So. 3d 57, 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (affirming revocation of juvenile's probation in Anders appeal but remanding for entry of written order of revocation specifying conditions found to have been 1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
violated); see also Vidana v. State, 313 So. 3d 206, 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021) (affirming revocation order and sentences in Anders appeal but remanding for amendment of revocation order to indicate conditions found to have been violated). Affirmed; remanded with instructions. KELLY and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur. __________________________ Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- A.T.J.F. v. State, 78 So. 3d 57 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012)
- T.M. v. State, 233 So. 3d 1275 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017)
- Badgers v. State, 267 So. 3d 512 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019)
- Vidana v. State, 313 So. 3d 206 (Fla. 2d DCA 2021)