MICHAEL CRAIG BOWERS
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Michael Craig Bowers appealed his conviction and sentence for offering prostitution. The appellate court affirmed his conviction but reversed the sentence regarding a $5,000 civil penalty, which the State conceded was improperly imposed.
The appellate court held that the trial court erred in imposing the $5,000 civil penalty because the relevant statutes do not authorize such a penalty for the offense of which Bowers was convicted. The court also held that the trial court lost jurisdiction to rule on Bowers' motion to correct the sentencing error because it was not filed within the 60-day timeframe.
[1] A civil penalty of $5,000 under section 796.07(6), Florida Statutes, applies only to violations of section 796.07(2)(f) and not to violations of section 796.07(2)(e), eve…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Therefore, we reverse Bowers' sentence and remand for the trial court to strike the civil penalty.”
Establishes the court's decision regarding the civil penalty.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceBowers was convicted of offering prostitution. He appealed his conviction and sentence, specifically challenging a $5,000 civil penalty imposed by the…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Civil Penalty Assessment cases and more on FLexlaw
ATKINSON, Judge. Michael Craig Bowers appeals his conviction and sentence for one count of offer of prostitution, lewdness, or assignation in violation of section 796.07(2)(e), Florida Statutes (2021).
We affirm his conviction without further discussion. Bowers also argues that the trial court erred by imposing a $5,000 civil penalty pursuant to section 796.07(6). The State concedes this error.
We agree with Bowers and accept the State's concession.
Therefore, we reverse Bowers' sentence and remand for the trial court to strike the civil penalty. In relevant part, Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2) provides, "If an appeal is pending, a defendant or the state may file in the trial court a motion to correct a sentencing error." "[I]f the trial court does not file an order ruling on the motion within 60 days, the motion shall be deemed denied." Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B). "Once the sixty days has passed with no action on the motion, the trial court's jurisdiction ends." Cammalleri v. State, 270 So. 3d 369, 371 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019) (quoting Wilson v. State, 846 So. 2d 1201, 1203 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003)). Bowers filed his motion to correct sentencing error on November 17, 2021.
The trial court purported to grant the motion and correct the sentencing error on January 24, 2022—over sixty days from the date Bowers filed his motion.
Therefore, the trial court did not have jurisdiction to grant Bowers' motion, and the motion was deemed denied. See Cammalleri, 270 So. 3d at 371; see also Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.800(b)(2)(B). Bowers was charged with second-degree misdemeanor offer of prostitution, lewdness, or assignation in violation of section 796.07(2)(e). A first-time violation of section 796.07(2)(e) is "[a] misdemeanor of the second degree . . . punishable as provided in s. 775.082 or s. 775.083[, Florida Statutes (2020)]." § 796.07(4)(a)1.
Sections 775.0821 and 775.0832 do not provide that a second-degree misdemeanor is punishable by a civil penalty of any amount. In relevant part, section 796.07(6) provides, "[a] person who violates paragraph (2)(f) shall be assessed a civil penalty of $5,000 if the violation results in any judicial disposition other than acquittal or dismissal." (Emphasis added.) However, Bowers was not 1 In relevant part, section 775.082 provides, "For a misdemeanor of the second degree, [a person may be sentenced to and punished] by a definite term of imprisonment not exceeding 60 days." § 775.082(4)(b). 2 In relevant part, section 775.083 provides, "Fines for designated crimes . . . shall not exceed: . . . (e) $500, when the conviction is of a misdemeanor of the second degree . . . . [or] (g) [a]ny higher amount specifically authorized by statute." § 775.083(1)(e), (g).
charged with violating section 796.07(2)(f).3 Because Bowers was not charged with violating section 796.07(2)(f) and the relevant statutes do not provide for assessment of a $5,000 civil penalty for violation of section 796.07(2)(e), the trial court erred by imposing a $5,000 civil penalty in its first corrected costs order. Affirmed in part; reversed in part; remanded. STARGEL and LABRIT, JJ., Concur. Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication. 3 Section 796.07(2)(f) provides that "[i]t is unlawful: . . . (f) [t]o solicit, induce, entice, or procure another to commit prostitution, lewdness, or assignation."
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Burttram v. State, 846 So. 2d 1201 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)
- Cammalleri v. State, 270 So. 3d 369 (Fla. 4th DCA 2019)