ADAM KEITH HORNE
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Competent, substantial evidence supports the convictions, the sentence is legal, and no arguable issues exist on appeal.
[1] In an Anders review, when counsel finds no arguable issues on appeal, the appellate court must independently review the record to determine whether any arguable issues ex…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceHorne and an accomplice encountered an elderly woman entering a store; after she offered them a ride to their hotel, they committed kidnapping, robber…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Anders Review cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Adam Keith Horne appeals the judgment and sentence entered following his convictions for kidnapping, robbery with a deadly weapon, and grand theft of a motor vehicle. The victim, an elderly woman, encountered Horne and his accomplice as she was entering a store to shop for groceries. The victim offered to help them after learning they needed a ride to their hotel. Horne and his accomplice accepted her assistance, then proceeded to commit the acts that resulted in the criminal convictions we review today.
Our independent Anders1 review of the record in this case reveals no arguable issues on appeal. Competent, substantial
evidence supports Horne’s convictions, and the trial court imposed a legal sentence for each of those convictions.
As for the various issues raised in Horne’s pro se brief,2 we note that almost all are unpreserved, and none constitute reversible or fundamental error. AFFIRMED.
OSTERHAUS, BILBREY, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. _____________________________
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)
- In re App. Court Response to Anders Briefs, 581 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 1991)