TRACY WAYNE O'HARA, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
TRACY WAYNE O'HARA, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
555 So. 2d 945
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm in this cause, but certify to the Florida Supreme Court, as a question of great public importance, the same question certified in Blankenship v. State, 545 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), and State v. Burch, 545 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989):
IS SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987), CONSTITUTIONAL?
DANIEL, C.J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pryor v. State, 558 So. 2d 203 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…ection 6, of the Florida Constitution. This court has held on numerous occasions that the statute does not violate the “one subject rule” of the Florida Constitution. See, e.g., Moore v. State, 556 So. 2d 771 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1990); O’Hara v. State, 555 So. 2d 945 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Keegan v. State, 553 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) and Leonardi v. State, 548 So. 2d 811 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). However, we have recognized the issue to be a question of great public importance and have certified it to the Florid…
Authorities Cited
- State v. Burch, 545 So. 2d 279 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
- Blankenship v. State, 545 So. 2d 908 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)