SMITH
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA

Fla. 1st DCA | 2023-09-13
No. 2023-1176
333 So. 3d 255 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2023) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam

PER CURIAM.

The Court dismisses this appeal as untimely. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.420(a)(2). The dismissal does not preclude Appellant from petitioning for a belated appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c).

ROBERTS, ROWE, and LONG, JJ., concur. _____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, and Megan Long, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Roberts v. Roberts (Fla. 2d DCA 2026)
    …ion filed by a parent (against either another parent or a nonparent) can support an injunction."). "We review the admission of child hearsay for an abuse of discretion." Oliver v. State, 397 So. 3d 104, 108 (Fla. 2d DCA 2024) (citing Smith v. State, 333 So. 3d 255, 261 (Fla. 1st DCA 2022)). Where, as here, the child declarant is unable to testify, a court may admit the child's hearsay statements if it determines that they are reliable and from a trustworthy source and if other evidence is presented to corrobo…
  • Oliver v. State (Fla. 2d DCA 2024)

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw