JOSEPH A. BLAINE, APPELLANT,
v.
MARTIN MARMOR AND GOLDIE MARMOR, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1989-11-14
No. 89-288
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BARKDULL and COPE, JJ.
555 So. 2d 1241 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1989)
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*1242] PER CURIAM.

As the record shows that appellant is a stranger to the note as to which he seeks to recover allegedly usurious payments, dismissal of plaintiff’s action is affirmed. See Nesbitt v. Citicorp Savings, 514 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987).

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw