SAMUEL LAMPLEY, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SAMUEL LAMPLEY, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
555 So. 2d 1242
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
UPON APPELLEE’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW MANDATE/MOTION FOR DIRECTIONS ON WHAT TO DO ON REMAND
PER CURIAM.
We adopt the opinion of this court in Webster v. State, 549 So. 2d 784 (Fla.4th DCA 1989).
DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and DELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Archer v. State, 681 So. 2d 296 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)…So. 2d 992 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). Section 394.467(4)(f), Florida Statutes (1993), requires administrative hearing officers to authorize continued involuntary placement if a person committed by a court continues to meet the criteria. Liebman v. State, 555 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989). But “if it is shown at the hearing that the patient does not meet the criteria for involuntary placement, he is entitled to be released,” § 394.467(4)(a), Fla. Stat. (1993), once the initial six-month hold expires, absent the in…
-
W.M. v. State, 992 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008)…ing even if it follows a very brief initial commitment period. We disagree for several reasons. Although subsection (7)(a) references administrative hearings, this does not mean that the circuit court relinquishes jurisdiction. In Liebman v. State, 555 So. 2d 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989), the Fourth District addressed the argument that it was unconstitutional for an administrative hearing officer to order continued involuntary placement under section 394.467. Liebman recognized that a circuit court must make the…
Authorities Cited
- Webster v. State, 549 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)