WAYNE HOSKINS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.
We affirm the appellant’s convictions and find no error in the judge’s instructions to the jury. The appellant contends that he was sentenced for the crime alleged in Count II notwithstanding that it was abandoned by the state. The sentencing error has been corrected. The record reflects an amended sentence in case number CJ85-4021, in which the defendant was committed to five years in state prison for the crime alleged in Count I. Immediately thereafter appears a notice of nolle prose-qui terminating and dismissing Count II. Therefore, we need take no corrective action.
Affirmed.
PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Haydu v. Haydu, 591 So. 2d 655 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…ed that the former husband retired from the Navy in July 1991. . Contrary to appellant’s assertion, trial courts have the discretion to order a spouse to maintain an annuity for a former spouse under the Survivor Benefit Plan. Heldmyer v. Heldmyer, 555 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). . For example, to use a simple formula from DeLoach: 40% (wife’s share) X f21 (years of marriage in military) -=- 23 (total years in military) ] x husband’s monthly benefit = wife’s monthly portion.…
-
Wise v. Wise, 765 So. 2d 898 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000)…As has been shown, federal law expressly empowers state courts to order a spouse to maintain a Survivor Benefit Plan for a former spouse, and that was done in this case in the 1993 dissolution judgment. See 10 U.S.C. § 1450(f); Heldmyer v. Heldmyer, 555 So. 2d 1324 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (noting change in federal statute permitted court to order spouse to maintain annuity for former spouse under SBP). In the instant case, it is apparent that ah annuity was awarded to the former wife as part of the overall scheme…
-
Kvinta v. Kvinta, 277 So. 3d 1070 (Fla. 5th DCA 2019)…t Former Husband’s pension plan, provided through his former employer, Deloitte & Touche, was a marital asset subject to equitable distribution in its entirety since the full amount was earned during the parties’ marriage. See Heldmyer v. Heldmyer, 555 So. 2d 1324, 1325 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (“[P]ensions earned by one spouse during marriage are marital assets.”). Upon his retirement Former Husband elected the option to receive what was termed a “survivor’s annuity” that would pay him $686 per month for the rest…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence