MCNAIR
v.
WENDELTA, INC.

Fla. 1st DCA | 2025-11-05
No. 2024-1394
2025 FL 9976 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (2025)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

Carol McNair appealed a summary judgment dismissing her age and retaliation employment discrimination suit against Wendelta, Inc. The trial court found the action time-barred under Florida Statute section 760.11(8)(c), but the appellate court reversed, holding that McNair's cause of action may still accrue under section 760.11(8).


Holding

The court reversed the summary judgment, holding that McNair's cause of action may still accrue under section 760.11(8), Florida Statutes, and therefore the action was not necessarily time-barred as a matter of law.


Key Quotes

“Carol McNair filed an age and retaliation employment discrimination suit against her former employer, Wendelta, Inc., following her termination.”

Establishes the factual foundation and nature of McNair's claims.

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Carol McNair filed an age and retaliation employment discrimination suit against her former employer, Wendelta, Inc., following her termination. The t…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Per_curiam
Per Curiam

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D2024-1394

CAROL MCNAIR,

Appellant,

v. WENDELTA, INC.,

Appellee.

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. William S. Henry, Judge.

November 5, 2025

PER CURIAM.

Carol McNair filed an age and retaliation employment discrimination suit against her former employer, Wendelta, Inc., following her termination.

The trial court granted summary judgment in Wendelta’s favor, finding that the action was time barred under section 760.11(8)(c), Florida Statutes. But because McNair’s cause may still accrue under section 760.11(8), we reverse. See Davis v. Big Bend Hospice, Inc., 50 Fla.

L. Weekly

D1873d (Fla. 1st DCA Aug. 20, 2025).

REVERSED.

2

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw