SANDRA BALDWIN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
SANDRA BALDWIN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
556 So. 2d 410
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1989)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION TO RECALL MANDATE: MOTION TO VACATE OPINION
PER CURIAM.
We recall our mandate issued July 25, 1989, 545 So. 2d 526.
Subsequent to our opinion in this case, the State located the trial court’s written order containing findings of fact to support its contempt order. The order apparently had been misfiled in the Broward County clerk’s office. Since our only directive to the trial court was to prepare an order containing written findings of fact, when such an order had already been prepared by the trial court, our original opinion now serves no purpose.
Based upon the record and order which now supplements the record on appeal, we affirm.
WALDEN, GUNTHER and WARNER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burnham v. Burnham, 884 So. 2d 390 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)…ubstitute for ... a hearing transcript”). The factual findings in the judgment concerning custody thus must be affirmed. See Coleman v. Coleman, 492 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Jolly v. Jolly, 572 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Heath v. Killian, 556 So. 2d 410, 412 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Those findings reflect that there was a substantial basis to support the trial court’s custody determination, which was well within that court’s wide discretion in ruling on custody based on the best interest of the child.…
Authorities Cited
- Davis v. State, 545 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)