SANDY CREEK AIRPARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
v.
SUMMERS
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida First District Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal from Sandy Creek Airpark Owners Association, Inc. on procedural grounds, holding that the order under review did not qualify as a final appealable order because it determined entitlement to judgment without entering a final judgment disposing of all pending claims.
The order is not a final appealable order because it merely determined entitlement to judgment without entering judgment and did not dispose of all pending claims. Therefore, the appeal lacks appellate jurisdiction and must be dismissed.
“dismissing appeal because order merely determined entitlement to judgment without entering judgment and did not dispose of all pending claims”
States the principle that an order determining entitlement to judgment is not final and appealable unless judgment is actually entered
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe opinion provides minimal factual details. The case involves an appeal by Sandy Creek Airpark Owners Association, Inc., but the specific factual ci…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Final Appealable Order cases and more on FLexlaw
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D2025-2245
SANDY CREEK AIRPARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Inc.,
Appellant,
v. NORMAN C. SUMMERS,
Appellee.
On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bay County. William S. Henry, Judge.
February 25, 2026
PER CURIAM.
The Court dismisses this appeal. See _Da-Vi Nails, Inc. Davi Nails Salon & Spa, LLC_, 131 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (dismissing appeal because order merely determined entitlement to judgment without entering judgment and did not dispose of all pending claims); _Hickox v. Taylor_, 933 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (dismissing appeal because order was not a final appealable order in that it granted summary judgment but failed to enter judgment).
LEWIS, ROBERTS, and NORDBY, JJ., concur. Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
Timothy J. Sloan and P. Jon Gronbeck of Timothy J. Sloan, P.А., Panama City, for Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Hickox v. Taylor, 933 So. 2d 675 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)
- Da-Vi Nails, Inc. v. Davi Nails Salon & SPA, LLC, 131 So. 3d 831 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014)