MARIA CHIVERS AND ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
NOELLE SMITH, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A party who recovers judgment, even if based on a threshold issue like permanent injury, is entitled to recover costs under section 57.041, Florida Statutes.
Plaintiff sued for personal injuries, but the jury found she did not sustain a permanent injury. The trial court entered judgment for the defendants b…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Third Party Complaint cases and more on FLexlaw
STONE, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to tax costs in favor of third party defendants against a third party plaintiff. We reverse.
Smith was sued for personal injuries arising out of an automobile accident. She filed a third party complaint against Chivers and Allstate. The jury returned a verdict against the plaintiff, finding that she had not sustained a permanent injury. The trial court entered a final judgment in favor of Smith, Chivers and Allstate. The court awarded costs in favor of Smith and against the plaintiff. However, the court denied the appellants’ motion to tax costs against Smith, despite a provision in the final judgment that the third party defendants “go hence without day,” because no determination was made in the verdict on the issue of liability for the accident.
Section 57.041, Florida Statutes, provides that a party “recovering judgment” shall recover costs. The wording of this statute is clear and unambiguous. This section applies to a recovery of costs by a third party defendant. Puder v. Revitz, 424 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). We deem Propst v. Neily, 467 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), relied upon by appellee and the trial court, to be inapposite to the recovery of costs under section 57.041.
The appellants, having recovered judgment, even if the jury verdict was based on a threshold issue, are entitled to costs as a matter of law. Therefore, the order is reversed and remanded for a hearing on the appellants’ motion to tax costs.
GLICKSTEIN, J. and MÚSSELMAN, JACK, Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
B.J. Militana and Marie Militana v. Ladd, 605 So. 2d 580 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)…go hence without a day.” Accordingly, as in Weeks, the defendants in the instant case are “entitled to a judgment for their taxable costs” since [*581] “they were the parties recovering judgment.” Weeks, 566 So. 2d at 345. See also Chivers v. Smith, 556 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Upson v. Hazelrig, 444 So. 2d 1127 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984); § 57.041, Fla. Stat. (1989). Accordingly, the final cost judgment entered in favor of the defendants’ liability insurance carrier is affirmed.…
-
Lynch v. Broward Cnty., 572 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…; and Anderson v. Gold Seal Vineyards, Inc., 81 Wash.2d 863, 505 P. 2d 790 (1973). This third party defendant was not brought into the case by the plaintiff, so the rationale of Puder v. Revitz, 424 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) and Chivers v. Smith, 556 So. 2d 798 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) does not apply. In all other respects, this cause is affirmed. AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART. ANSTEAD and WALDEN, JJ., concur.…
Authorities Cited
- Puder v. Revitz, 424 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Matthias J. Propst v. John A. Neily, D.O., 467 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)