RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND JIMMY R. PATE, APPELLANTS,
v.
JACK D. WIENEKE AND PAUL M. WIENEKE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Arbitrators lack the authority to award attorney's fees, but a trial judge may assess fees upon confirmation if a contract or statute permits.
Appellants challenged a final judgment confirming an arbitration award of attorney's fees. The underlying dispute involved securities transactions, an…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Arbitrator cases and more on FLexlaw
RYDER, Acting Chief Judge.
Raymond James & Associates, Inc. and Jimmy R. Pate challenge a final judgment confirming the arbitrators’ award of attorney’s fees in favor of Jack D. Wieneke and Paul M. Wieneke (Wienekes) in a dispute involving securities transactions. We reverse.
The Wienekes filed a complaint against Raymond James and others alleging violations of sections 517.301, 895.03(3), and 812.035, Florida Statutes, (1987), (securities fraud, RICO Act, civil theft), fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence and gross negligence. Pursuant to the customer’s agreements between Raymond James and the Wienekes, the claims were submitted to arbitration. A panel of three arbitrators entered an award in favor of the Wienekes for damages totalling in excess of $80,-000.00. The arbitrators also made an award of attorney’s fees in favor of the Wienekes and against Raymond James in the amount of $9,000.00.
The Florida Arbitration Code specifically takes attorney’s fees out of the broad grant of authority it gives to arbitrators. § 682.11, Fla.Stat. (1987); Fewox v. McMerit Construction Co., 556 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Zac Smith & Co., Inc. v. Moonspinner Condominium Association, Inc., 534 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Consequently, arbitrators cannot award attorney fees. When the case is taken to the trial judge for confirmation, however, the judge may then assess fees. Fewox.
Upon reconsideration by the trial judge of the petition for attorney’s fees in this case, if there exists a contract or statute which allows the parties to be awarded fees on the underlying law suit, the trial judge may then award fees. Fewox. If there is no contract or statute allowing an award of fees, then the parties are not entitled to an award.
The case is reversed with regard to the confirmation of the award of attorney’s fees and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Reversed and remanded.
FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Raymond v. Wieneke, 591 So. 2d 956 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…ALTENBERND, Judge. Raymond, James & Associates, Inc., appeals an award of attorneys’ fees by the trial court after remand from this court in Raymond, James & Associates, Inc. v. Wieneke, 556 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We affirm the trial court’s decision to grant attorneys’ fees, but reverse the award because it exceeds the maximum amount awardable under the fee agreement between the Wienekes and their attorneys. See Lane v. Head, 566 So. 2d 5…1 / 2
-
Freedman v. Collier Commercial Builders, Inc., 596 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…. Co., 408 So. 2d 1044 (Fla.1982); Fewox v. McMerit Const. Co., 556 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), approved, Insurance Co. of North America v. Acousti Engineering Co. of Florida, 579 So. 2d 77 (Fla.1991); Raymond James & Associates, Inc. v. Wieneke, 556 So. 2d 800 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). There is neither a statute nor a contractual predicate in the instant matter supporting the trial court’s fee award. Finally, we reject Collier’s contention that the parties had stipulated during the arbitration proceeding to an…
Authorities Cited
- Fewox v. McMERIT Constr. Co., 556 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
- ZAC Smith & Co., Inc. v. Moonspinner Condo. Ass'n, Inc., 534 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
- Branch v. State, 495 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)