JOHN SAVARY DAME, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
JOHN SAVARY DAME, PETITIONER,
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
556 So. 2d 1109
Florida Supreme Court (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We have for review Dame v. State, 547 So. 2d 1038, 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989), to answer the following certified question:
DOES SECTION 893.13, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987), VIOLATE THE ONE-SUBJECT RULE OF THE FLORIDA CONSTITUTION?
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. We have answered this question in the negative in Burch v. State, 558 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1990). We approve the decision below.
It is so ordered.
EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, barkett, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jordan v. State, 560 So. 2d 315 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…iss the charges on the ground that section 893.13, Florida Statutes, was enacted in violation of the one-subject requirements set forth in article III, section 6, of the Florida Constitution. The supreme court recently held otherwise, Dame v. State, 556 So. 2d 1109 (Fla.1990); Burch v. State, 558 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1990), and we affirm this point ■on the authority of those decisions. We now turn to Jordan’s contention that the lower court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal based on legal insuffi…
Authorities Cited
- Burch v. State, 558 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 1990)
- Dame v. State, 547 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)