STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

EXUM WALKER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Builders Square & KM Admin. Servs. v. Drake, 557 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …ording to his physician, claimant needed to have someone on call and available at all times to assist him or to clean up after him when the need arose. Thus, the award of attendant care 24 hours per day was proper. See City of North Miami v. Towers, 557 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). See also Standard Blasting & Coating v. Hayman, 476 So. 2d 1385 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), where this court noted that it is proper to award attendant care for the hours when a spouse is required to be on call and available to attend…
• King Lumber Co. & Feisco v. Renford Bloomfield, 560 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …d on law of the case as to the quantum of care previously awarded, and sufficient to support the award of such care for 12 hours per day through September 11, 1987, and for 24 hours per day from that point forward. See City of North Miami v. Towers, 557 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and Builders Square v. Drake, 557 So. 2d 115 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). This court’s opinions in Mr. C’s TV Rental v. Murray, 559 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), and Williams v. Amax Chemical Corp., 543 So. 2d 277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989…
• Kraft Dairy Grp. & Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Cohen, 645 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
  …1988. Mr. C’s TV Rental v. David Murray, 559 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (the 1988 amendment prescribing the value of the attendant or custodial care provided by a family member does not affect substantive rights); City of North Miami v. Towers, 557 So. 2d 112 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (hourly value assigned to the care provided by claimant’s wife should not exceed that prescribed by section 440.13(2)(e)2 (now 440.13(2)(h)2)). Under section 440.13(2)(h)2, Mrs. Cohen would be paid the amount she received at her…

Authorities Cited

• State v. Beckman, 547 So. 2d 210 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)