JULIAN RODRIGUEZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-02-20
No. 89-1292
Before NESBITT, COPE, and GERSTEN, JJ.
557 So. 2d 182 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. DiGuilio, 491 So. 2d 1129 (Fla.1986); Toole v. State, 479 So. 2d 731 (Fla.1985).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Elisha Gilbert v. State, 558 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
    …have been presented in defendant’s first petition. Thus, his second petition is procedurally barred. Tafero v. State, 524 So. 2d 987 (Fla.1987); Booker v. State, 503 So. 2d 888 (Fla.1987); Witt v. State, 465 So. 2d 510 (Fla.1985); Williams v. State, 557 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). Affirmed.…
  • Mordkoff v. State, 728 So. 2d 803 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999)
    …fendant’s motion for post conviction relief, as the motion was successive and raised issues that were or could have been raised on direct appeal or in his previous 3.850 motions. See Christopher v. State, 489 So. 2d 22 (Fla.1986); Williams v. State, 557 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990). However, the trial court erred in ordering that fifty percent of defendant’s gain-time be forfeited. The Florida legislature has provided that “[a]ll or any part of the gain-time earned by a prisoner according to the provisions…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw