WILLIE JAMES JOHNSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1990-02-26
No. 89-2813
WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
557 So. 2d 223 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 20 cases


Opinion of the Court
ERVIN, Judge.

ERVIN, Judge.

The denial of appellant’s 3.850 motion1 is affirmed. Although appellant styled his motion as one seeking relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a), he is not challenging the legality of the sentences imposed, but rather is contending that the sentences were imposed in violation of the laws of the state. Such an argument is cognizable under Rule 3.850 rather than Rule 3.800(a). However, as appellant’s motion was filed more than two years after January 1, 1987,2 his motion is untimely and therefore denied.

AFFIRMED.

WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur. . See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

. The opinion written on appellant’s direct appeal was filed on February 16, 1982. See Johnson v. State, 409 So. 2d 1158 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). Under Rule 3.850, a person whose judgment and sentence became final prior to January 1, 1985, had until January 1, 1987, to file a motion in accordance with the rule. Appellant did not file his motion until June 9, 1989.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Tonnie Lee Martin v. State, 816 So. 2d 187 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002)
    …efense claims that trial court unduly restricted voir dire inquiry were not preserved for appellate review where defendant affirmatively accepted the jury and did not renew his objection at any time prior to swearing of the jury); Casimiro v. State, 557 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 567 So. 2d 434 (Fla.1990) (defendant waived all objections concerning jury composition when defendant accepted jury panel); Springer v. State, 513 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (if defendant objects before trial to possib…
  • Gandy v. State, 560 So. 2d 1363 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
    …as amended, are affirmed. Alexander v. State, 404 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). AFFIRMED. NIMMONS, J., and FORD L. THOMPSON, (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur. . For a similar distinction between 3.800(a) and 3.850 motions, see Johnson v. State, 557 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). . Rule 3.850 expressly provides that "[a]ny person whose judgment and sentence became final prior to January 1, 1985, shall have until January 1, 1987, to file a motion[.]” Although appellant’s convictions were rendered in 1979…
  • Massey v. State, 589 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)
    …t to harmless error analysis because the sentence was illegal, the term "illegal’’ as used in Grubbs and Nunziata, must mean there was a violation of due process. A sentence is not illegal simply because a statute was violated. See Johnson v. State, 557 So. 2d 223 (Fla. 1st DCA), rev. denied, 563 So. 2d 632 (Fla.1990). It should be noted that it was the legislature — not the majority — that made the requirement that notice be written merely a procedural requirement. Section 775.084(3), Florida Statutes (1989)…

Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw