JAMES NATHANIEL CANNADY, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Consolidated convictions for similar offenses occurring over different days must be reversed if the offenses are connected only by the defendant and similarity.
Defendant was charged with eighteen felony counts stemming from six criminal episodes over seventy days, consolidated for trial under Florida's crimin…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Connected Acts Or Transactions cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
On a theory that the defendant’s six criminal episodes over a seventy-day period constituted a “one-man crime wave” in violation of Florida’s criminal RICO statute, section 895.03, Florida Statutes (1985), the State consolidated all eighteen felony counts for a single trial. This appeal is taken from convictions and 1,698 years in sentences entered on all eighteen counts. We reverse.
At the conclusion of all the evidence, the court entered a judgment of acquittal on the RICO count finding, obviously, that there was no evidence of an essential criminal enterprise. See Boyd v. State (Fla. 3d DCA Case No. 88-1093) opinion filed Feb. 20, 1990) [15 F.L.W. 489]; State v. Nishi, 521 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 3d DCA), rev. denied, 531 So. 2d 1355 (Fla.1988). The cases were nevertheless submitted to the jury, in consolidated form, on grounds that they constituted connected acts or transactions. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.151(a).
In State v. Williams, 453 So. 2d 824 (Fla.1984), the controlling authority, the supreme court, noting that its ruling is settled law in this state, held that where convictions were obtained on nine consolidated informations involving acts or transactions occurring over eight different days, and where the offenses were connected only by the fact that they were allegedly committed by the same defendant and were similar in nature, reversal was mandated. This case is indistinguishable.
Reversed and remanded for separate trials.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- State v. Williams, 453 So. 2d 824 (Fla. 1984)
- State v. Nishi, 521 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)