RANDOLPH NICHOLAS RUSSO, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction of possession of, and trafficking in, controlled substances. We conclude that the amendment to the information did not prejudice the defendant, see State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373, 1375 (Fla.1989); that the motion for mistrial with respect to the joint trial with the codefendant was correctly denied, see Johnson v. State, 355 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 362 So. 2d 1054 (Fla.1978); and that there was sufficient evidence both with respect to the weight of the cocaine and with respect to the elements of conspiracy. See LaPolla v. State, 504 So. 2d 1353, 1357 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gen. Mortg. Assocs., Inc. v. Campolo Realty & Mortg. Corp., 678 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996)…lly called in this instance a “yield savings clause” — after the mortgagee both accelerated the mortgage and recovered interest at the default rate. The mortgagee relies on dicta in the Fourth District opinion in Florida Nat’l Bank v. Bankatlantic, 557 So. 2d 596, 598 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), quoted by the Supreme Court in Bankatlantic, 589 So. 2d at 258: that unless otherwise specifically provided for in the note, the lender cannot upon the lender’s acceleration also collect the prepayment penalty, [e.s.] The…
-
Fla. Nat'l Bank OF Miami v. Bankatlantic, 589 So. 2d 255 (Fla. 1991)…OVERTON, Justice. We have for review Florida National Bank v. Bankatlantic, 557 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), in which the district court [*256] held that the mortgagee’s exercise of an option to accelerate payments owing under a mortgage note following the mortgagor’s intentional default did not preclude the mortgagee from collecting a…
-
Casino Espanol de la Habana, Inc. v. Bussel, 566 So. 2d 1313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…cceleration of the maturity date is made after maturity, not before.” General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Uresti, 553 S.W. 2d 660, 663 (Tex.App.1977) (emphasis in original) (citations omitted). Relying on Florida Nat’l Bank of Miami v. Bankatlantic, 557 So. 2d 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), Casino argues that denial of a prepayment discount would amount to imposition of a prepayment penalty. We disagree. In Bankatlantic, the fourth district held that a borrower who intentionally defaults specifically to avoid a pre…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Anderson, 537 So. 2d 1373 (Fla. 1989)
- LaPOLLA v. State, 504 So. 2d 1353 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
- Carey v. State, 355 So. 2d 143 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)