COLLIE A. COX, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 2d DCA | 1990-03-02
No. 87-03126
SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.
557 So. 2d 674 Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1990) Caution
Cited by 7 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the finding of the trial court that appellant Collie Cox violated the terms and conditions of his probation. The sentence imposed, thirty months in prison followed by community control, represents a departure from the guideline recommendation of twelve to thirty months. State v. Van Kooten, 522 So. 2d 830 (Fla.1988). No written reasons in support of the departure are to be found within the record before us.

Accordingly, we remand this case for resentencing within the guideline range. Since this can be accomplished by deleting the consecutive community control provision, appellant need not be present for this purpose.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and LEHAN and HALL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ellis Singletary v. Mary Kendra Lewis, M.D., 584 So. 2d 634 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
    …y have entered into the verdict. Evidence of improper considerations by the jury will justify a jury interview. International Union of Operating Engineers Local 675 v. Kinder, 573 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Bickel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 557 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1990). Prejudice against one of the parties or the making of prejudicial comments in the presence of the jury is evidence of improper considerations. International Union, supra; Sanchez, supra. This court finds the decision in United S…
  • Burkett v. State, 731 So. 2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)
    …iffin v. State, 517 So. 2d 669 (Fla.1987). The resentencing that this court ordered the trial court to conduct could not be accomplished by simply excising the improper portion of the sentence; it required additional consideration. See Cox v. State, 557 So. 2d 674 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). Accordingly, appellant must be resentenced again, and this time appellant must be present. In appellant’s second issue, which is the court’s alleged error in sentencing appellant to an upward departure, the State again concedes…
  • State v. Devoney, 675 So. 2d 155 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
    …f incident outside courtroom); International Union of Operating Eng'rs, Local 675 v. Kinder, 573 So. 2d 385, 386 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) (courthouse custodian exhorted jurors to give large award to plaintiff); Bickel v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co., 557 So. 2d 674, 675 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990) (allegation juror performed independent experiment and related results to panel); Snook v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 485 So. 2d 496, 499 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986) (allegation juror conducted own experiment and reported results t…
    1 / 2

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw