JOSE VEGA, SR., APPELLANT,
v.
ZELLWIN FARMS AND LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Work Search Obligation cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal of the judge of compensation claims’ denial of wage-loss benefits. Although we find there was competent, substantial evidence to support the judge’s determination that claimant did not perform a valid work search, we are compelled to reverse because the record reflects that the employer and carrier did not provide wage-loss forms or otherwise inform appellant of his obligation to perform a work search until December 8, 1988. This was required before benefits could be denied for failure to perform a valid work search. Rios v. Fred Teitelbaum Construction, 522 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Ninia v. Southwest Bottlers, 547 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Accordingly, we reverse with directions that wage-loss benefits be awarded through December 8, 1988. The judge shall consider claimant’s entitlement to any appropriate costs, interest, or fees. Because claimant’s reply brief acknowledged that penalties would not be due upon reversal, the judge shall not consider any penalties, award.
BOOTH, NIMMONS and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fla. Drum Co. v. Elgin Thompson, 668 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 1996)…soned that the same concern is raised where a jury has knowledge that a plaintiff has insurance coverage that would have ameliorated the loss. Id. (citing Crowell v. Fink, 135 So. 2d 766 (Fla. 1st DCA 1961) and Dynair Tech of Fla. v. Cayman Airways, 558 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)). In addition to these general propositions, the court further stated that in this case it was immaterial whether Thompson had insurance coverage: the coverage could not have been set off against the shipyard’s own financial liab…
-
Elgin Thompson v. Fla. Drum Co., 651 So. 2d 180 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)…A 1961). Had Thompson chosen to seek recovery from his insurer, it would have been no benefit to Pensacola Shipyard, because it could not have set off the insurance coverage against its own financial liability. Dynair Tech of Fla. v. Cayman Airways, 558 So. 2d 30 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). It is not a material fact in this case that Thompson could have called upon his insurer to provide money to pay for repairs possibly expediting the work and reducing the exposure to further damage. Pensacola Shipyard could have a…
Authorities Cited
- Rios v. Fred Teitelbaum Constr. & U.S. Fid. & Guar. Co., 522 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)
- Ninia v. Sw. Bottlers & Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 547 So. 2d 966 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)