ORRIN T. HUNT, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION, BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINERS, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Motion For Stay Pending Appeal cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant files a motion to stay the final order of the Department of Professional Regulation, Board of Psychological Examiners (Board), pending this appeal. We deny the motion for stay.
The final order of the Board, among other things, placed appellant’s license on probation for two years with specific restrictions. In support of his motion for stay pending appeal, appellant cites to Section 120.68(3), Florida Statutes, which states that “if the agency decision has the effect of suspending or revoking a license, super-sedeas shall be granted as a matter of right....” The final order of the Board neither suspended nor revoked the appellant’s license, accordingly, the automatic stay provision of Section 120.68(3), is not applicable. The motion for stay is denied.
ERVIN, WENTWORTH and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Hawthorne, 573 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 1991)…EHRLICH, Justice. We have for review Hawthorne v. State, 558 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified its decision as in direct conflict with Dickens v. State, 556 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990), on the issue of whether fair market value of property at the time of an offense i…
-
Allred v. State, 642 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…ts, a restitution hearing will be necessary. At any such hearing, Allred should not be precluded from demonstrating his present and future financial resources and needs in accordance with section 775.089(7), Florida Statutes. See Hawthorne v. State, 558 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), quashed on other grounds, 573 So. 2d 330 (Fla.1991) (the burden of proving the defendant’s financial cir-. cumstances rests on the defendant). JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur. . The trial judge asked, "Is there any dispute about…
-
Clemond Edward Harris v. State, 593 So. 2d 1169 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992)…. 1st DCA 1990), and this court has ruled that generally a defendant’s failure to assert an inability to pay restitution is treated as a waiver, of the right to raise the issue on appeal. See Williams v. State, 565 So. 2d at 851; Hawthorne v. State, 558 So. 2d 156 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), quashed on other grounds, State v. Hawthorne, 573 So. 2d 330 (Fla.1991); Abbott v. State, 543 So. 2d 411 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989). Nevertheless, the waiver rule is not applied rigidly. For example, in Abbott, since an evidentia-ry he…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence