FAIRWAY INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
ROLLIE SHUEMAKER AND MARY L. SHUEMAKER, APPELLEES
FAIRWAY INDUSTRIES, INC., APPELLANT,
ROLLIE SHUEMAKER AND MARY L. SHUEMAKER, APPELLEES
558 So. 2d 192
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990)
Caution
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed. General Textile Co., Inc. v. Martin County, 542 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); White Palms of Palm Beach, Inc. v. Fox, 525 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Russell v. Russell, 507 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987).
STONE, WARNER and POLEN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Carey D. Miller, 581 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…e, in this case, presented evidence that the ap-pellee was in Indiana for a few months in 1986. Assuming that this evidence was sufficient to shift the burden to the appel-lee, as it would if the speedy trial rule was at issue, State v. Antonietti, 558 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), the appellee met his burden. At the time the appellee left the state of Florida, there were no charges pending against him and no reason requiring him to stay in Florida. As soon as he was notified of the charges by Indiana offi…
-
Spurlock v. The Honorable Michael F. Cycmanick, 584 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…We further hold that trying petitioner on the felony aggravated battery charge does not violate his right to a speedy trial under rule 3.191(a). Under rule 3.191(e), the initial burden is on the state at the discharge hearing. State v. Antonietti, 558 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Rule 3.191(e) states: No presumption of non-availability attaches but if the state objects to discharge and presents any evidence tending to show non-availability of the defendant, the accused must by competent proof establish…
-
Cliff Ross Dixon v. State, 901 So. 2d 384 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)…or that the call was an order of the court requiring defense to appear. It is the State’s burden and duty to bring a defendant to trial and do it swiftly. Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972); see State v. Antonietti, 558 So. 2d 192, 193 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); see also Kelly v. Goldstein, 649 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The burden to comply with the speedy trial rule is on the State. Saunders v. State, 436 So. 2d 166, 169 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). After March 4, 2002, the State sti…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Russell v. Russell, 507 So. 2d 661 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)
- In re the Est. OF Caroline Young, 525 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
- White Palms OF Palm Beach, Inc. v. FOX, 525 So. 2d 518 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)
- Gen. Textile Co., Inc. v. Martin Cnty., 542 So. 2d 1072 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)