THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERTO MORENO, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Common Law Certiorari cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
The state petitions for writ of common law certiorari to review an order of the Appellate Division, Circuit Court, of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, affirming an order of the county court which granted a motion to suppress.
A Hialeah police officer was the only witness who testified before the county judge and plainly detailed the defendant’s alleged violation of sections 316.193 and 316.1925, Florida Statutes (1987). The officer’s testimony was unrebutted, uncontra-dicted, and unimpeached. The contraband that was seized flowed as an incident to the defendant’s arrest. Consequently, the county court impermissibly granted the defendant’s motion to suppress and the Circuit Court Appellate Division committed plain error in affirming that ruling. See State v. Fernandez, 526 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA), cause dismissed, 531 So. 2d 1352 (Fla.1988), and cases cited therein.
For the foregoing reasons, certiorari is granted and the decision of the Circuit Court Appellate Division affirming the erroneous suppression order is quashed with directions to reinstate.
It is so ordered.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Waton v. Waton, 887 So. 2d 419 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004)…ouple would have continued to live together. Furthermore, unlike Hjor-taas, the actual agreement in this case does contain Husband’s financial information. Wife also argues that the agreement was a product of overreaching. See Tenneboe v. Tenneboe, 558 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); McGregor v. McGregor, [*423] 447 So. 2d 994 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). However, we find each of the authorities relied on to be distinguishable. Unlike Tenneboe, this case does not involve a situation where Wife agreed to pay her inc…
-
Thomas v. Randell D. Thomas, 571 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…h agreements. Casto, 508 So. 2d at 334. In Casto, the court emphasized that lack of legal representation of one of the parties is not sufficient, in and of itself, to vacate or modify the agreement. 508 So. 2d at 335. See also Tenneboe v. Tenneboe, 558 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Rather, presence or absence of legal counsel is one factor to consider, together with all other circumstances in the case when claims of fraud, duress or other actionable misconduct are made. See Tenneboe, and cases cited therei…
-
Kuchera v. Kuchera, 983 So. 2d 776 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008)…re notaries public, becoming effective May 1992. . For these reasons, we reject his contention that the failure to separate the property after their second reconciliation establishes a waiver or abrogation of the agreement. . Tenneboe v. Tenneboe, 558 So. 2d 470 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), concerned a marital settlement agreement, one reached without counsel, and was properly decided under Casto. But the other authority cited by Judge Kroll, Steinhardt v. Rudolph, 422 So. 2d 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), concerned a 99-…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- State v. Fernandez, 526 So. 2d 192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)