EUGENE A. LINDSLEY ET AL., APPELLANTS,

v.

LIZZIE MCIVER ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• The Fed. Land Bank of Columbia v. Godwin, 107 Fla. 537 (Fla. 1931)
  …12 So. 946; Amos v. Gunn, 84 Fla. 285, 94 So. 615; Hotel Halcyon Corp. v. Miami Real Estate Co., 89 Fla. 156, 103 So. 403; Rawls v. City of Miami, [*542] 82 Fla. 65, 89 So. 351; Phifer v. Abbott, 73 Fla. 402, 74 So. 488; Holt v. DeLoach-Edwards Co., 56 Fla. 902, 48 So. 1039. The bill in all essential requirements is' sufficient as a basis for the foreclosure of the mortgage held by the complainant. If on the coming in of an answer and the taking of testimony it should appear that Alderman has an unsatisfi…
• The Seaboard Oil Co. v. Donovan, 99 Fla. 1296 (Fla. 1930)
  …e evidence. ’ ’ [*1303] The granting or refusing of a temporary injunction is within the discretion of the court. (Savage v. Parker, 53 Fla. 1002, 43 So. R. 507; Builders Supply Co. v. Acton, 56 Fla. 756, 47 So. R. 822; Holt v. De Loach-Edwards Co., 56 Fla. 902, 48 So. R. 1039); but if the allegations of the bill are sufficient and the evidence in support thereof is ample to warrant it and no sufficient defense is made, an order denying an injunction will be reversed. Taylor v. Florida E. C. Ry. Co., 54 Fl…
• City of W. Palm Beach v. Eppelman, 132 Fla. 686 (Fla. 1938)
  …llen v. County of Pinellas, 90 Fla. 398, 106 So. 73; Savage v. Parker, 53 Fla. 1022, 43 So. 507; Gillis v. State Live Stock Sanitary Board, 94 Fla. 890, 114 So. 509; Builders Supply Co. v. Acton, 56 Fla. 756, 47 So. 822; Holt v. DeLoach-Edwards Co., 56 Fla. 902, 48 So. 1039; Allen v. Hawley, 6 Fla. 142, 63 Am. Dec. 198; McKinnie v. Dickenson, 24 Fla. 366, 5 So. 34; Taylor v. Florida East Coast R. Co., 54 Fla. 635, 45 So. 574, 127 Am. St. Rep. 155, 16 L. R. A. (N. S.) 307, 14 Ann. Cas. 472; Viser v. Willard…