THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
BRODERICK DEMERRITTE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-03-20
No. 89-742
Before BARKDULL, NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
558 So. 2d 501 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990) Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Marshall, 476 So. 2d 150 (Fla.1985).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Ulysses Johnson v. State, 565 So. 2d 879 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)
    …required to perform oral sex on Johnson. This issue then became a jury question and the jury found against Johnson. Since the [*880] jury decides the credibility of the testimony, we will not second guess their decision. See, e.g., Guzman v. State, 558 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) and cases cited therein. PRIOR DRUG USE TESTIMONY Johnson testified that the sex was voluntary after he and the victim had smoked cocaine. The victim testified that no drugs were involved that evening and her blood samples, take…
  • Guzman v. State, 606 So. 2d 699 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Medina v. State, 573 So. 2d 293 (Fla.1990); Guzman v. State, 558 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990).…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw