JOAN MURPHY, PETITIONER,
v.
JAMES H. MURPHY AND THE HONORABLE GENE FISCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
JOAN MURPHY, PETITIONER,
JAMES H. MURPHY AND THE HONORABLE GENE FISCHER, CIRCUIT JUDGE OF THE SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RESPONDENTS
558 So. 2d 532
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We grant the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition and quash the order of the trial court referring the cause to a special master without the consent of petitioner. See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c).
ANSTEAD, WARNER and GARRETT, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Hanor v. The Honorable Harry G. Hinckley, Jr., 584 So. 2d 1129 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…, temporary alimony and attorney’s fees, to a master over the objection of Hanor. Reference under those circumstances is prohibited by Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c). Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So. 2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Murphy v. Murphy, 558 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Accordingly, the writ shall issue. Pursuant thereto, the trial court shall vacate the order of reference and proceed in conformity with this opinion. DELL and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.…
-
Lunger v. The Honorable Harry G. Hinckley, Jr., 572 So. 2d 1042 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…er as a named respondent. The respondent concedes error. We grant the petition for writ of mandamus and prohibition and quash the order of the trial court on the authority of Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So. 2d 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Murphy v. Murphy, 558 So. 2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.490(c). ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.…
-
Joara Freight Lines, Inc. v. Perez, 160 So. 3d 114 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)…. Garcia, 958 So. 2d 947, 949 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007); Pesut v. Miller, 773 So. 2d 1185, 1186 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Hanor v. Hinckley, 584 So. 2d 1129, 1130 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Taylor v. Taylor, 569 So. 2d 1389, 1389 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Murphy v. Murphy, 558 So. 2d 532, 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Miller v. Lifshutz, 558 So. 2d 195, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); Bathurst v. Tuner, 533 So. 2d 939, 941 (Fla. 3d DCA [*117] 1988). Moreover, a trial court cannot appoint a special master on its own motion. See Pesut, 773 So. 2d…