WILLIAM B. WALKER, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM B. WALKER, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
558 So. 2d 535
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Based on the State’s confession of error, see Cobb v. State, 511 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), the defendant’s conviction and sentence are reversed and remanded with directions to grant the motions to suppress.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't OF Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Farley, 633 So. 2d 69 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994)…the Respondent’s burden to prove substantial compliance with the rule or the test should not be admitted into evidence. The Petitioner does not bear the burden of proof that he did not take something by mouth or regurgitate. Ver [*71] non v. State, 558 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). 7. In this case, there was no evidence to conclude, as the hearing officer did, that the seventeen (17) minute period was substantial compliance with Rule 10D-42.-024(1)(e). See State v. Sharp, 47 Fla. Supp.2d 84 (7th Cir.Ct.19…1 / 2
Authorities Cited
- Cobb v. State, 511 So. 2d 698 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)