WILFREDO RAMOS - HADDOCK

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

PER CURIAM. Wilfredo Ramos-Haddock challenges an order revoking his probation in case numbers 2012-CF-3806 and 2012-CF-10891 after he admitted violating his probation. We affirm the revocation of probation and the sentences without comment.

- 2 - The State correctly concedes, however, that the trial court erred in entering a written order of revocation of probation that did not specify the condition(s) that Ramos-Haddock violated. See Underwood v. State, 98 So. 3d 745, 745 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) (and cases cited therein). In addition, the amended judgment and sentence in case number 2012-CF-3806 erroneously indicate that he admitted that he had violated condition 5 of his probation.

Accordingly, we reverse the order revoking probation in both cases and remand for the trial court to enter a written order of revocation that specifies the condition(s) violated. On remand, the trial court shall also strike the statement in the amended judgment and sentence in case number 2012-CF-3806 that Ramos-Haddock admitted that he had violated condition 5 of his probation.

Affirmed and remanded with directions. NORTHCUTT, MORRIS, and ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, JJ., Concur.