ANITA SHAW RANDALL, APPELLANT,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND REHABILITATIVE SERVICE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1990-04-10
No. 89-2352
Before BARKDULL, JORGENSON and GODERICH, JJ.
559 So. 2d 386 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1990)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See McLaughlin v. Department of Natural Resources, 526 So. 2d 934 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Holmes v. Turlington, 480 So. 2d 150 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); Heifetz v. Department of Business Regulation, Div. of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco, 475 So. 2d 1277 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); City of Miami v. Kory, 394 So. 2d 494 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State Beverage Department v. Ernal, Inc., 115 So. 2d 566 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959); Section 916.178, Florida Statutes (1987). Compare Griessenaur v. Department of Energy, 754 F. 2d 361 (U.S.Ct.App.Fed.Cir.1985).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw